Genomics & Informatics
- Review
- Open access
- Published:
Neuromuscular diseases: genomics-driven advances
Genomics & Informatics volume 22, Article number: 24 (2024)
Abstract
Neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) are a group of rare disorders characterized by significant genetic and clinical complexity. Advances in genomics have revolutionized both the diagnosis and treatment of NMDs. While fewer than 30 NMDs had known genetic causes before the 1990s, more than 600 have now been identified, largely due to the adoption of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies such as whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). These technologies have enabled more precise and earlier diagnoses, although the genetic complexity of many NMDs continues to pose challenges. Gene therapy has been a transformative breakthrough in the treatment of NMDs. In spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), therapies like nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam have dramatically improved patient outcomes. Similarly, Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) has seen significant progress, most notably with the FDA approval of delandistrogene moxeparvovec, the first micro-dystrophin gene therapy. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including the rarity of many NMDs, genetic heterogeneity, and the high costs associated with genomic technologies and therapies. Continued progress in gene therapy, RNA-based therapeutics, and personalized medicine holds promise for further breakthroughs in the management of these debilitating diseases.
1 Background
Neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) have experienced significant advancements in diagnosis and treatment, largely driven by breakthroughs in genomics. Before the 1990s, fewer than 30 NMDs had their molecular genetic causes identified [1]. Today, however, over 600 single-gene NMDs have been characterized, with new discoveries continuing to emerge each year [2]. In the past decade, gene therapy research has advanced at an unprecedented rate, leading to the development and approval of therapies for previously untreatable diseases. This progress marks a fundamental shift in the management of NMDs.
2 Genetic complexity in neuromuscular diseases
NMDs represent a group of rare disorders with significant clinical diversity and genetic complexity. These diseases are classified into various subgroups, including muscular dystrophies, congenital myopathies, distal myopathies, metabolic myopathies, myotonic syndromes, congenital myasthenic syndromes, motor neuron diseases, hereditary motor and sensory neuropathies, and ion channel muscle diseases [2]. Each subgroup shares multiple causative genes, which means that different molecular genetic diagnoses can be derived from similar clinical symptoms, and the same gene may result in different phenotypes. Since the initial application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in NMD patients in 2010 [3], this technology has revolutionized the field by enabling the efficient analysis of multiple genes simultaneously. NGS technologies, including whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), have significantly accelerated the discovery of novel disease-causing genes in NMDs [4, 5]. These technologies have enabled more precise and earlier diagnoses, improving disease management and treatment planning. Targeted panel NGS or WES is now being adopted as a standard in clinical NMD diagnosis, while emerging tools like transcriptome analysis and long-read sequencing further expand the field [6,7,8].
While NGS has greatly advanced the diagnosis of NMDs, the genetic complexity, particularly the diversity of causal variants, continues to make accurate diagnosis challenging. For numerous major NMDs, molecular diagnosis remains infeasible with NGS. For example, Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) shows genetic heterogeneity, with around 80% of patients having exon deletions or duplications in the dystrophin gene, and about 20% presenting with sequence variants, including intronic mutations in 5%, which complicates diagnosis [9]. In spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), over 95% of patients exhibit homozygous deletion of exon 7 in the SMN1 gene [10]. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is caused by the expansion of a CTG trinucleotide repeat in the noncoding region of the DMPK gene [11], while facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1 (FSHD1) is characterized by the contraction of the D4Z4 repeat array on chromosome 4q35 [12]. Moreover, in metabolic myopathies, mitochondrial DNA mutations are a critical diagnostic factor, often presenting as either single nucleotide variants or large deletions [13]. Additionally, certain genetic disorders, such as Fukuyama congenital muscular dystrophy, show genotypic differences across ethnicities, necessitating tailored diagnostic approaches [14, 15]. These examples underscore the genetic diversity and complexity associated with NMDs, highlighting the challenges of achieving accurate molecular diagnosis even in the era of NGS technologies (Table 1).
3 Gene therapy: a new era in NMD treatment
Advancements in genetics have also led to significant progress in the treatment of NMDs, with one of the most notable achievements being the development of gene therapies, which have substantially impacted the therapeutic landscape of these disorders. SMA is a prime example, with the antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) therapy nusinersen (Spinraza) nearing its tenth year since its successful introduction [16, 17]. Following this, the development and clinical application of onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma), an adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapy [18, 19], and risdiplam (Evrysdi), a small molecule oral drug [20, 21], have ushered in a new era of treatment options for SMA. All three SMA therapies have demonstrated significant efficacy in altering the natural course of SMA, notably by prolonging ventilation-free survival and enabling the achievement of major motor milestones [16,17,18,19,20,21]. These treatments achieve optimal outcomes when administered at the earliest possible stage, ideally prior to symptom onset. Accordingly, we are now in an era emphasizing newborn screening [22], with the USA implementing SMA screening for all newborns as of January 2024. Similarly, in DMD, exon-skipping therapies [23, 24] marked a major advancement, and more recently, the FDA approval of delandistrogene moxeparvovec (Elevidys), the first micro-dystrophin gene therapy [25], represents another significant milestone (Table 2). With more gene therapies under development and clinical trials actively ongoing, the future of NMD treatment holds great promise for further breakthroughs.
4 Challenges and future directions
Despite the progress in the field, there remain several challenges and limitations. One of the main obstacles is the clinical rarity of many NMDs, making large-scale clinical trials difficult to conduct. The heterogeneity in disease presentation and progression further complicates the development of universal treatments. Moreover, the genetic complexity of NMDs, with its diverse range of mutations and variable phenotypes, presents challenges in both diagnosis and treatment. In many cases, the specific mutation causing the disease may still be unknown, and even when the mutation is identified, developing effective therapies can be difficult due to the multifaceted nature of the underlying pathophysiology. Another major limitation is the cost and accessibility of advanced genomic technologies and therapies. Gene therapies, while promising, are often expensive and not readily available in all regions, limiting their impact on the broader patient population. Ensuring equitable access to these treatments remains a critical challenge for the future. The future of neuromuscular disease research and treatment lies in continued advancements in gene therapy and RNA-based therapeutics.
5 Conclusions
Neuromuscular diseases represent a group of rare yet complex disorders that have benefited significantly from advancements in genomics. The identification of over 600 disease-causing genes, coupled with the development of gene therapies, has brought hope to patients suffering from previously untreatable conditions. However, challenges such as genetic heterogeneity, clinical rarity, and accessibility to treatments remain. The future of NMD research promises continued innovation, with gene editing, RNA-based therapies, and personalized medicine leading the way towards more effective and equitable treatments for these debilitating diseases.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Abbreviations
- AAV:
-
Adeno-associated virus
- ASO:
-
Antisense oligonucleotide
- DMD:
-
Duchenne muscular dystrophy
- NGS:
-
Next-generation sequencing
- NMD:
-
Neuromuscular disease
- SMA :
-
Spinal muscular atrophy
- WES:
-
Whole-exome sequencing
- WGS:
-
Whole-genome sequencing
References
Kaplan JC, Fontaine B. Neuromuscular disorders: gene location. Neuromuscul Disord. 1991;1(3):221–3.
Benarroch L, Bonne G, Rivier F, Hamroun D. The 2024 version of the gene table of neuromuscular disorders (nuclear genome). Neuromuscul Disord. 2024;34:126–70.
Lupski JR, Reid JG, Gonzaga-Jauregui C, Rio Deiros D, Chen DC, Nazareth L, et al. Whole-genome sequencing in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(13):1181–91.
Vasli N, Laporte J. Impacts of massively parallel sequencing for genetic diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125(2):173–85.
Ankala A, da Silva C, Gualandi F, Ferlini A, Bean LJ, Collins C, et al. A comprehensive genomic approach for neuromuscular diseases gives a high diagnostic yield. Ann Neurol. 2015;77(2):206–14.
Hong SE, Kneissl J, Cho A, Kim MJ, Park S, Lee J, et al. Transcriptome-based variant calling and aberrant mRNA discovery enhance diagnostic efficiency for neuromuscular diseases. J Med Genet. 2022;59(11):1075–81.
Yepez VA, Gusic M, Kopajtich R, Mertes C, Smith NH, Alston CL, et al. Clinical implementation of RNA sequencing for Mendelian disease diagnostics. Genome Med. 2022;14(1):38.
Owusu R, Savarese M. Long-read sequencing improves diagnostic rate in neuromuscular disorders. Acta Myol. 2023;42(4):123–8.
Cho A, Seong MW, Lim BC, Lee HJ, Byeon JH, Kim SS, et al. Consecutive analysis of mutation spectrum in the dystrophin gene of 507 Korean boys with Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy in a single center. Muscle Nerve. 2017;55(5):727–34.
Prior TW, Snyder PJ, Rink BD, Pearl DK, Pyatt RE, Mihal DC, et al. Newborn and carrier screening for spinal muscular atrophy. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A(7):1608–16.
The International Myotonic Dystrophy Consortium (IDMC). New nomenclature and DNA testing guidelines for myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). The International Myotonic Dystrophy Consortium (IDMC). Neurology. 2000;54(6):1218–21.
Nguyen K, Puppo F, Roche S, Gaillard MC, Chaix C, Lagarde A, et al. Molecular combing reveals complex 4q35 rearrangements in Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy. Hum Mutat. 2017;38(10):1432–41.
Gorman GS, Chinnery PF, DiMauro S, Hirano M, Koga Y, McFarland R, et al. Mitochondrial diseases. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16080.
Kobayashi K, Kato R, Kondo-Iida E, Taniguchi-Ikeda M, Osawa M, Saito K, et al. Deep-intronic variant of fukutin is the most prevalent point mutation of Fukuyama congenital muscular dystrophy in Japan. J Hum Genet. 2017;62(11):945–8.
Lim BC, Ki CS, Kim JW, Cho A, Kim MJ, Hwang H, et al. Fukutin mutations in congenital muscular dystrophies with defective glycosylation of dystroglycan in Korea. Neuromuscul Disord. 2010;20(8):524–30.
Finkel RS, Mercuri E, Darras BT, Connolly AM, Kuntz NL, Kirschner J, et al. Nusinersen versus sham control in infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(18):1723–32.
Mercuri E, Darras BT, Chiriboga CA, Day JW, Campbell C, Connolly AM, et al. Nusinersen versus sham control in later-onset spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(7):625–35.
Day JW, Finkel RS, Chiriboga CA, Connolly AM, Crawford TO, Darras BT, et al. Onasemnogene abeparvovec gene therapy for symptomatic infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy in patients with two copies of SMN2 (STR1VE): an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(4):284–93.
Mercuri E, Muntoni F, Baranello G, Masson R, Boespflug-Tanguy O, Bruno C, et al. Onasemnogene abeparvovec gene therapy for symptomatic infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (STR1VE-EU): an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):832–41.
Baranello G, Darras BT, Day JW, Deconinck N, Klein A, Masson R, et al. Risdiplam in type 1 spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(10):915–23.
Masson R, Mazurkiewicz-Beldzinska M, Rose K, Servais L, Xiong H, Zanoteli E, et al. Safety and efficacy of risdiplam in patients with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy (FIREFISH part 2): secondary analyses from an open-label trial. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(12):1110–9.
Dangouloff T, Vrščaj E, Servais L, Osredkar D, SMA NBS World Study Group. Newborn screening programs for spinal muscular atrophy worldwide: where we stand and where to go. Neuromuscul Disord. 2021;31(6):574–82.
Charleston JS, Schnell FJ, Dworzak J, Donoghue C, Lewis S, Chen L, et al. Eteplirsen treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: exon skipping and dystrophin production. Neurology. 2018;90(24):e2146–54.
Komaki H, Nagata T, Saito T, Masuda S, Takeshita E, Sasaki M, et al. Systemic administration of the antisense oligonucleotide NS-065/NCNP-01 for skipping of exon 53 in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(437):eaan0713.
Zaidman CM, Proud CM, McDonald CM, Lehman KJ, Goedeker NL, Mason S, et al. Delandistrogene moxeparvovec gene therapy in ambulatory patients (aged >/=4 to <8 years) with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: 1-year interim results from study SRP-9001-103 (ENDEAVOR). Ann Neurol. 2023;94(5):955–68.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AC independently conceptualized, researched, wrote, and revised the entire manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, A. Neuromuscular diseases: genomics-driven advances. Genom. Inform. 22, 24 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s44342-024-00027-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s44342-024-00027-y